Your editor knows the code. These agents also know the project.
Cursor makes one developer faster inside their editor. Current works a level up: it knows what the team decided, what customers asked for and what’s already in flight, and hands that to the agent before it writes a line.
Where Current is different
- Context before code
- Every agent in a project starts with its decisions, recent activity, linked issues and pages. No more pasting the spec into a prompt.
- For the whole team
- PMs and designers can ask @Current to fix a bug from team chat. Engineers review the branch, the diff and a live preview in the same place.
- Any engine
- Run Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI or OpenCode on your own subscription. Swap per chat.
Where Cursor is good
- A polished editor with deep, fast AI completions.
- Great for hands-on coding in a single repo.
- Background agents for longer tasks.
Together
Keep your editor. Agent branches in Current are plain git worktrees: open one in Cursor whenever you want to take the wheel.
| Cursor | ||
|---|---|---|
| Team chat, organised by project | Yes | No |
| Linked PRs, issues and docs, live in the project | Yes GitHub, Linear, Notion | Partly Through MCP |
| Decisions as their own record, with a source | Yes | No |
| Meeting notes into decisions and issues | Yes | No |
| Customer signals routed to the right project | Yes Intercom, Gong | No |
| Coding agents on their own branch | Yes Sandboxed worktrees | Yes |
| Live previews with comments pinned to elements | Yes | Partly Built-in browser |
| One timeline across every tool | Yes | No |
| Bring your own AI: Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode | Yes | Partly Its own models and keys |